Human rights lawyer, Inibehe Effiong, has challenged the national spokesperson for the Nigeria Police Force, Muyiwa Adejobi, to cite any law that criminalizes insults in the country.
The Police spokesperson in a tweet on Friday morning said insulting someone online amounts to cyberbullying crimes, which he described as a criminal offence that is punishable.
Reacting, the lawyer described Adejobi’s statement as ridiculous and without any legal justification.
This is ignorance of the law raised to power 1000.
The fact that this very ridiculous opinion is from the spokesperson of the primary law enforcement agency in Nigeria says a lot about the decadence of our institutions.
To be clear, raining curses on someone is not a criminal… https://t.co/cIDnbwUs6U— Inibehe Effiong (@InibeheEffiong) December 20, 2024
The lawyer stated that the position of the police is unconstitutional, adding that the offence is an invention of the Police which is not supported by any Nigerian law.
Effiong wrote: “The fact that this very ridiculous opinion is from the spokesperson of the primary law enforcement agency in Nigeria says a lot about the decadence of our institutions.
“By virtue of Section 36 (12) of the Nigerian Constitution, for an act or omission of be termed a crime, it must be expressly and specifically defined as such under a written law.
“This Force PRO has a history of inventing imagery offences from his head.
“For example, telling someone ‘it shall not be well with you’ is a prayer; prayer can be positive or negative. Wishing someone evil is also not a matter for legal redress.
“The law does not concern itself with trifling things or spiritual matters. What is more appalling is the fact that the supposed image maker of the @PoliceNG does not know that the Cybercrimes Act had since been amended, and that the notorious wordings of the provisions of the old Section 24 which the police has been using to witch-hunt critics has been repealed,” the lawyer added.
“I urge Nigerians to ignore the misleading statement of @Princemoye1 as same is baseless.”